<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuffnang going for Revenue Sharing model?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geminigeek.com/blog/archives/2007/11/nuffnang-going-for-revenue-sharing-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geminigeek.com/blog/archives/2007/11/nuffnang-going-for-revenue-sharing-model/</link>
	<description>Ramblings, Random Writings and Wordpress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:27:18 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tan</title>
		<link>http://geminigeek.com/blog/archives/2007/11/nuffnang-going-for-revenue-sharing-model/comment-page-1/#comment-9036</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geminigeek.com/blog/archives/2007/11/nuffnang-going-for-revenue-sharing-model/#comment-9036</guid>
		<description>There are many local ad representative networks around, Nuffnang and Advertlets are just the first ones that target blogs. The two big players are Innity and Pixel Media Asia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many local ad representative networks around, Nuffnang and Advertlets are just the first ones that target blogs. The two big players are Innity and Pixel Media Asia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tan</title>
		<link>http://geminigeek.com/blog/archives/2007/11/nuffnang-going-for-revenue-sharing-model/comment-page-1/#comment-9035</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geminigeek.com/blog/archives/2007/11/nuffnang-going-for-revenue-sharing-model/#comment-9035</guid>
		<description>If a campaign costs X amount, the media buyer (companies like Mindshare, Carat, Zenith Optimedia) already take about 15%, then Nuffnang takes a further say 30% from that remaining 85%, what the blogger gets is actually 70% of the 85% of the original amount.

Revenue share is how all ad networks work, I am personally signed up with Pixel Media Asia and we work on revenue share as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a campaign costs X amount, the media buyer (companies like Mindshare, Carat, Zenith Optimedia) already take about 15%, then Nuffnang takes a further say 30% from that remaining 85%, what the blogger gets is actually 70% of the 85% of the original amount.</p>
<p>Revenue share is how all ad networks work, I am personally signed up with Pixel Media Asia and we work on revenue share as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeminiGeek</title>
		<link>http://geminigeek.com/blog/archives/2007/11/nuffnang-going-for-revenue-sharing-model/comment-page-1/#comment-9029</link>
		<dc:creator>GeminiGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geminigeek.com/blog/archives/2007/11/nuffnang-going-for-revenue-sharing-model/#comment-9029</guid>
		<description>@Trixie: So, what you mean by revenue sharing is the widely use affiliates or referrals thing?

@Danny: I think so too. But one more thing to add is that they could be growing too fast. I wonder if they&#039;ve really made a market research to see if expanding to Singapore is a wise choice. That could be one reason they start charging $1 for every cheque withdrawals. It&#039;s not much, but a lot of publisher starts bitching about their missing $1.

If they&#039;re really operating in the type of revenue sharing model that I am talking about, I guess it&#039;s time for them to adjust their own profit level, since they didn&#039;t disclose how much are they earning openly. Unlike TLA where they&#039;ve made it clear where they earn 50% and the publisher earns 50%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Trixie: So, what you mean by revenue sharing is the widely use affiliates or referrals thing?</p>
<p>@Danny: I think so too. But one more thing to add is that they could be growing too fast. I wonder if they&#8217;ve really made a market research to see if expanding to Singapore is a wise choice. That could be one reason they start charging $1 for every cheque withdrawals. It&#8217;s not much, but a lot of publisher starts bitching about their missing $1.</p>
<p>If they&#8217;re really operating in the type of revenue sharing model that I am talking about, I guess it&#8217;s time for them to adjust their own profit level, since they didn&#8217;t disclose how much are they earning openly. Unlike TLA where they&#8217;ve made it clear where they earn 50% and the publisher earns 50%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Foo</title>
		<link>http://geminigeek.com/blog/archives/2007/11/nuffnang-going-for-revenue-sharing-model/comment-page-1/#comment-9028</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geminigeek.com/blog/archives/2007/11/nuffnang-going-for-revenue-sharing-model/#comment-9028</guid>
		<description>You have brought a valid point I may have missed out there. :)

However, I&#039;m assuming they&#039;re not making enough because it&#039;s not the advertisers who&#039;re approaching them at the moment. Although Nuffnang and Advertlets may be the only local people doing this, a business in Asia is always a challenge against its business culture as well.

In other words, advertisers say propose to me a plan. They go in and make sure they win the signing. Now this signing may be inclusive of 30%, less or more though as the publishers we don&#039;t know.

So Nuffnang may not be making enough because they&#039;re establishing their brand at this point and want their name to be #1 when an advertiser wants to use blog advertising. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have brought a valid point I may have missed out there. <img src='http://geminigeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m assuming they&#8217;re not making enough because it&#8217;s not the advertisers who&#8217;re approaching them at the moment. Although Nuffnang and Advertlets may be the only local people doing this, a business in Asia is always a challenge against its business culture as well.</p>
<p>In other words, advertisers say propose to me a plan. They go in and make sure they win the signing. Now this signing may be inclusive of 30%, less or more though as the publishers we don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>So Nuffnang may not be making enough because they&#8217;re establishing their brand at this point and want their name to be #1 when an advertiser wants to use blog advertising. <img src='http://geminigeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trixie</title>
		<link>http://geminigeek.com/blog/archives/2007/11/nuffnang-going-for-revenue-sharing-model/comment-page-1/#comment-9024</link>
		<dc:creator>Trixie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geminigeek.com/blog/archives/2007/11/nuffnang-going-for-revenue-sharing-model/#comment-9024</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s just a semantics thing; my understanding is that revenue sharing means affiliates get a percentage of sales as opposed to pay-per-click, pay-per-sale, or other methods of figuring rewards for affiliates. While it&#039;s all ultimately revenue sharing, that term seems to be used to mean affiliates are paid a percentage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just a semantics thing; my understanding is that revenue sharing means affiliates get a percentage of sales as opposed to pay-per-click, pay-per-sale, or other methods of figuring rewards for affiliates. While it&#8217;s all ultimately revenue sharing, that term seems to be used to mean affiliates are paid a percentage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
